Posts Tagged ‘division’
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, president of Iran and general irritation to the goals of the United States. The media always ignores how this blister came about in the first place. No one wants to talk about the Shah that the United States help put in place many years ago only to fester into something much worse. It was a gradual blister that came into place. The Shah tried to convert a Muslim monarchy into a western society overnight bringing about opposition and sowing the seeds for chaos. Many of the western ideals and philosophies, including female suffrage went against the grain of a traditional Muslim society. It simply was a bad fit for the traditional Muslim population. Many people grew dissatisfied with the Shah’s plan and were imprisoned and tortured for their opposition. It was not long till chaos ensued and a handful of radical university students and an ousted Ayatollah Khomeini came to power. The hostage crisis of 1979 followed. When Ayatollah Khomeini finally passed away it wasn’t long before Ahmadinejad came to power. There is speculation that he was one of the original hostage takers from 1979. Aside from that he’s a menace that will have to be dealt with carefully.
Mahmoud has close ties with the Iran’s Republic National Guard and has his own secret police to quell dissenters within Iran. It is my belief that Mahmoud’s strategy is to incite martyrdom across the Middle East if the United States were to make the first attack. I suspect that if the United States does decide to make an attack that they will do it with Israel acting as a proxy. Either scenario will pop the Iranian blister that will spread the lymph of martyrdom throughout Middle East ensuing a very difficult situation for the United States to navigate.
This a good example of Democratic waffling on an issue courtesy of the Clintonistas. Mr. B.O.’s knowledge of constitutional liberties sounds good, but his sense of discretion really veers to the left here. He’s has already groveled and apologized for United States stance against terrorism in the Middle East when he spoke in Cairo during the early part of his presidency. There is really no need for additional apologies and further compromise
The searing point here is that he implies religious freedom and extremism go hand-in-hand, therefore if a tiny minority of Islam are free to worship they are free to bomb and terrorize in the same breath. This has serious implications because this suggests that he condones a tiny minority of evangelic Christians that want to murder abortionist doctors. I make no apologies for my comparisons here as I feel that what Mr. B.O. is saying here would include this type of behavior.
I also think this issue also has undercurrents that go well beyond the presidency. I actually feel that Mr. B.O. is simply a puppet that is carrying out the directives that emanate from a more sinister group that is involved in the direction of economic and social policy worldwide. This issue of building a mosque near Ground Zero is actually meant to divide our nation even further so that in some point in the near future our nation will have to be rescued by a sinister organization that can collectively be called global government.
- Bill on Hungout and Hacked Episode 1
- skeeter on Gun Control?
- Ronald Hicks on Gun Control?
- Skeeter on Gun Control?
- Bill on Alien Abductions Get Strange
- Development Blog
- John Kitchin's Blog
- Suggest Ideas
- Support Forum
- WordPress Planet